Reconsideration of Value: Challenging a Low Appraisal

Want to see what you qualify for? I can run your numbers and give you a clear answer quickly.

Reconsideration of Value: Challenging a Low Appraisal

A low appraisal can create an immediate problem for a home purchase or refinance.

The lender generally calculates the mortgage using the property’s appraised value—not simply the value expected by the borrower, seller, or real estate agent.

When the appraisal appears to contain factual errors, unsupported conclusions, overlooked market data, or potential discriminatory practices, the borrower may be able to request a reconsideration of value.

A reconsideration of value, commonly called an ROV, asks the appraiser to reassess the appraisal report using specific information that may affect the value conclusion.

An ROV is not a demand that the appraiser increase the value.

It is a structured process for identifying credible concerns and asking that they be reviewed objectively.

The strength of the request depends on the quality of the evidence—not how strongly the parties disagree with the appraisal.

What Is a Reconsideration of Value?

A reconsideration of value is a request submitted through the mortgage lender asking the appraiser to reevaluate an appraisal report.

The request may identify:

Incorrect property information
Unsupported appraisal adjustments
Relevant comparable sales that were not considered
Material property features that were overlooked
Inaccurate descriptions of the property or neighborhood
Inconsistencies within the report
Unacceptable appraisal practices
Potential discriminatory language or analysis
Other deficiencies that may affect the value conclusion

The appraiser reviews the information and responds through a revised appraisal report or formal commentary.

Possible outcomes include:

The value remains unchanged
The value increases
The value decreases
Factual errors are corrected without changing the value
Comparable sales are addressed but rejected as less relevant
Additional appraisal review becomes necessary
The lender determines that another valuation is required

An ROV does not guarantee a higher value.

It provides a controlled process for evaluating whether the original appraisal remains credible and adequately supported.

When Should You Consider an ROV?

A reconsideration may be appropriate when there is specific evidence that the appraisal contains a meaningful problem.

Examples include:

Gross living area is materially incorrect
A bedroom or bathroom is missing from the report
Lot size is inaccurate
A pool, garage, guest house, or other improvement was overlooked
Renovations were not considered
The property condition was reported incorrectly
A comparable sale was recorded with incorrect information
Better comparable sales were available as of the appraisal’s effective date
Adjustments appear inconsistent or unsupported
The appraisal uses an incorrect property type
The report misidentifies the neighborhood or market area
The analysis contains prohibited discriminatory considerations
The appraisal contradicts itself in a way that may affect value

An ROV should not be requested solely because:

The value is lower than the contract price
The seller needs a certain amount
The buyer wants to borrow more
An online estimate shows a higher number
Another real estate agent believes the property is worth more
The owner spent a large amount on improvements
The parties are emotionally invested in the transaction

Fannie Mae’s current guidance states that a request to change value must be based on material and substantive issues—not solely on the fact that the appraisal does not support the proposed loan amount.

Who Can Request a Reconsideration of Value?

The borrower may initiate an ROV through the mortgage lender.

The lender may also identify appraisal concerns through its own review process.

A real estate agent may help the borrower gather:

Comparable sales
MLS data
Property-feature documentation
Renovation information
Factual corrections

However, the request must follow the lender’s process.

The borrower, seller, real estate agent, and loan officer should not pressure or attempt to influence the appraiser directly.

The lender or its authorized appraisal channel communicates the approved request to the appraiser.

This structure protects appraisal independence and creates a record of the request.

Text a Question

If you want help walking through your specific situation, I can run the numbers with you.

Get Pre-Approved

How the ROV Process Works

The process generally follows these steps:

The borrower receives the appraisal report.
The borrower and lender review the appraisal.
Potential errors or deficiencies are identified.
Relevant supporting evidence is gathered.
The borrower completes the lender’s ROV form or written request.
The lender reviews the submission for completeness and relevance.
An underwriter or appraisal specialist determines whether the request is appropriate.
The lender submits the approved request to the appraiser.
The appraiser evaluates the information.
The appraiser issues a response or revised report.
The lender reviews the response.
The borrower is informed of the outcome.

The lender remains responsible for determining whether the final appraisal is reliable and acceptable.

The appraiser controls their independent value conclusion. The lender controls whether the appraisal is acceptable for the mortgage.

Information Required for a Borrower-Initiated ROV

For conventional loans delivered to Fannie Mae, the current borrower-initiated ROV requirements generally require the request to include:

Borrower’s name
Property address
Effective date of the appraisal
Appraiser’s name
Date of the ROV request
Identification of unsupported, inaccurate, or deficient areas
Additional information or comparable properties
Data sources for the additional information
An explanation of why the information supports reconsideration

Fannie Mae currently limits borrower-submitted alternative comparable properties to no more than five.

The borrower generally has one borrower-initiated ROV opportunity per appraisal report.

That makes it important to assemble the strongest complete request before submitting it.

Start by Checking the Appraisal for Factual Errors

Before searching for higher-priced comparable sales, review the appraisal carefully for objective errors.

Compare the report with:

Purchase contract
MLS listing
Survey
County property records
Builder plans
Renovation records
Previous appraisal
Property photographs
Actual property features

Check information such as:

Address
Legal description
Property type
Lot size
Gross living area
Bedroom count
Bathroom count
Garage spaces
Pool
Fireplace
View
Construction quality
Property condition
Renovations
Accessory units
Outbuildings
Effective age
Homeowners association
Flood-zone information
Zoning
Utilities

Not every error changes value.

A small typographical error may require correction without affecting the appraisal conclusion.

The strongest ROV identifies errors that are both factual and potentially material to the valuation.

What Makes a Strong Alternative Comparable Sale?

An alternative comparable should be genuinely relevant to the subject property.

Consider factors such as:

Proximity to the subject
Same neighborhood or competing market area
Similar property type
Similar living area
Similar lot size
Similar age
Similar quality
Similar condition
Similar updates
Similar bedroom and bathroom count
Similar garage and outdoor amenities
Recent closing date
Sale completed before the appraisal’s effective date
Arm’s-length market transaction

A higher sale price alone does not make a property a better comparable.

A home may have sold for more because it:

Is substantially larger
Has superior construction
Was completely renovated
Sits on a better lot
Has a better view
Includes more acreage
Is located in a different school district
Is in a superior neighborhood
Has features the subject property lacks

The request should explain why each proposed comparable is more relevant than—or provides meaningful information beyond—the sales already used.

Comparable Sales Should Usually Have Closed Before the Appraisal Date

An appraisal reflects value as of a specific effective date.

A property that closed after that date may not have been available to the appraiser.

A pending or active listing can sometimes provide supporting market context, but it is not the same as a completed sale.

The strongest evidence usually includes sales that:

Closed before the appraisal’s effective date
Were available through reliable market sources
Reflect the same relevant market
Could reasonably have been considered

If a comparable closed shortly after the appraisal but was under contract beforehand, the lender may determine whether it provides useful information. Its treatment depends on appraisal standards, agency requirements, and the facts of the transaction.

How to Present Alternative Comparable Sales

For each proposed sale, provide:

Property address
MLS number
Closing date
Sale price
Living area
Lot size
Property type
Bedroom and bathroom count
Distance from the subject
Relevant condition or renovation details
Explanation of similarity
Explanation of why the sale should be considered

A concise comparison is more effective than sending a long list of addresses without analysis.

For example:

“123 Oak Street closed 30 days before the appraisal. It is located in the same subdivision, has similar construction quality, is within 150 square feet of the subject, has the same bedroom count, and was renovated to a similar level. It was not included in the original report.”

That is more useful than:

“This house sold for more, so the appraisal is wrong.”

Renovations and Improvements

A reconsideration may identify improvements the appraisal did not accurately describe.

Useful documentation may include:

Renovation list
Completion dates
Contractor invoices
Building permits
Before-and-after photographs
Architectural plans
Material descriptions
Energy-efficiency upgrades

However, improvement cost does not equal market value.

Spending $100,000 on renovations does not automatically increase the property’s market value by $100,000.

The appraiser evaluates how buyers in that market respond to the improvements.

The ROV should focus on whether the improvements were overlooked, mischaracterized, or improperly compared—not simply their original cost.

Unsupported or Inconsistent Adjustments

An ROV may question adjustments that appear inconsistent or insufficiently explained.

For example:

Similar size differences receive significantly different adjustments
A pool is adjusted in one comparable but not another without explanation
A location adjustment appears unsupported
Renovated and unrenovated properties are treated similarly
Significant acreage differences receive no analysis
The report’s narrative conflicts with the adjustment grid

The request should identify the specific inconsistency and explain why it may affect the value conclusion.

Borrowers and agents should avoid declaring that an adjustment “must” equal a specific amount unless reliable market evidence supports that claim.

Appraisal adjustments are intended to reflect market reaction, not construction cost or personal opinion.

What Evidence Usually Does Not Work?

Weak ROV submissions often rely on:

Zillow or other automated online estimates
Active listings presented as completed sales
Distant properties from superior neighborhoods
Homes with substantially different quality or condition
Sales completed after the relevant valuation date without explanation
A list of high-priced homes with no comparison
Seller expectations
Original purchase price from years earlier
Property tax assessments
Cost of improvements without market support
Emotional arguments
Statements that the borrower “needs” the value
Pressure related to the closing date
Accusations unsupported by evidence

Online valuations and tax assessments may differ from a mortgage appraisal because they use different data, purposes, and valuation methods.

The ROV needs property-specific, verifiable information.

Appraisal Independence Matters

Appraisers must remain independent.

Interested parties should not attempt to influence the appraiser through:

Threats
Intimidation
Promises of future business
Withholding payment
Demands to reach the contract price
Direct pressure from agents or loan officers
Conditioning compensation on a value result

Permitted communication may include requests to:

Correct factual errors
Explain inconsistencies
Consider relevant market information
Address possible deficiencies
Review potential discriminatory practices

The distinction is important.

An appropriate ROV asks the appraiser to evaluate evidence.

It does not tell the appraiser what value must be reached.

What Happens After the Appraiser Receives the ROV?

The appraiser reviews the submitted concerns and determines whether the original report should be revised.

The appraiser may:

Accept a new comparable
Explain why a proposed comparable is not appropriate
Correct factual errors
Revise adjustments
Add additional analysis
Maintain the original value
Increase the value
In rare circumstances, decrease the value

The response should address the submitted concerns.

Under Fannie Mae’s current process, the appraiser must update the report to correct identified errors and comment on the changes—even when a minor correction does not affect value.

The revised report then returns to the lender for review.

How Long Does an ROV Take?

There is no universal turnaround time.

The timeline can depend on:

Loan program
Lender procedures
Appraiser availability
Number of issues submitted
Quality of the supporting information
Whether additional research is required
Whether the report needs multiple corrections
Whether an appraisal review is ordered

An ROV may add several days or longer to the transaction.

Borrowers should submit concerns as soon as the appraisal is reviewed.

Waiting until immediately before closing can create problems involving:

Financing deadlines
Appraisal contingencies
Rate-lock expiration
Closing schedules
Seller expectations
Moving arrangements

This is why appraisal review should occur promptly within the process described in Mortgage Appraisal Process Explained.

Can You Request More Than One ROV?

For Fannie Mae loans, a borrower is generally permitted one borrower-initiated ROV per appraisal report.

A borrower should not submit a weak initial request and expect multiple opportunities to add better evidence later.

The lender may still have separate responsibilities to address appraisal deficiencies identified through its own review.

However, the borrower should treat the initial submission as the complete request.

Before submitting, confirm that:

Factual errors are documented
Proposed comparables are relevant
Data sources are included
Explanations are specific
Duplicate or weak evidence has been removed
The request follows the lender’s format

Can the Borrower Speak Directly to the Appraiser?

The borrower may interact with the appraiser during the property visit, but value-related concerns should be handled carefully.

After the appraisal is completed, the formal ROV should generally be submitted through the lender.

The borrower or agent should not contact the appraiser directly to pressure them to change the value.

If the borrower has documentation, it should be provided through the lender’s approved process.

Can the Seller Submit an ROV?

The borrower initiates the formal request through the lender.

The seller and listing agent may help provide:

Renovation history
Property records
Comparable sales
MLS documentation
Factual corrections
Information about unique property features

The borrower and lender then determine what should be included in the formal submission.

The seller does not control the mortgage lender’s appraisal-review process.

Can the Lender Order a Second Appraisal?

A lender cannot simply order repeated appraisals until one reaches the desired value.

A second appraisal may be appropriate when:

The original report has material deficiencies
The lender cannot resolve concerns with the original appraiser
An appraisal review identifies reliability problems
Unacceptable appraisal practices are suspected
Program requirements call for another appraisal
The lender documents a legitimate basis for replacement

Fannie Mae requires the lender to select the most reliable appraisal—not automatically the appraisal with the highest value.

The lender must document why another report was necessary and why the selected valuation is considered credible.

A borrower generally cannot demand a new appraisal merely because the original appraiser did not increase the value after an ROV.

Desk Reviews and Field Reviews

Instead of immediately ordering a new appraisal, the lender may obtain an appraisal review.

A desk review analyzes the original report and available market data without necessarily visiting the property.

A field review may include an exterior property observation and additional market analysis.

A review appraiser may evaluate:

Comparable-sale selection
Adjustments
Property characteristics
Market conditions
Report consistency
Support for the value conclusion
Compliance with appraisal standards

The review could support the original appraisal, identify deficiencies, or develop another opinion of value.

What If the Value Does Not Change?

If the value remains unchanged, the buyer and seller still have several possible options.

These may include:

Renegotiating the purchase price
Buyer bringing additional cash
Seller reducing the price
Splitting the appraisal shortage
Changing the down payment
Restructuring the mortgage
Selecting another eligible program
Using an appraisal-gap provision
Exercising an applicable contract contingency
Canceling the transaction when permitted

The best solution depends on:

Contract terms
Available cash
Required reserves
Loan-to-value limits
Mortgage insurance
Seller motivation
Buyer’s long-term financial comfort

Bringing additional cash may solve the loan-to-value issue, but that does not automatically mean it is the best financial decision.

Review Should You Pay More Than the Appraised Value? and When Should You Keep Cash Instead of Making a Larger Down Payment?

Example of a Reconsideration of Value

Assume:

Contract price: $650,000
Appraised value: $610,000
Value shortage: $40,000

The borrower and agent review the report and identify:

Living area understated by 300 square feet
A renovated kitchen described as average and dated
A nearby comparable with similar size and condition omitted
An inferior property used from outside the competing neighborhood

The ROV includes:

Building plans supporting the living area
Photographs and invoices documenting the kitchen renovation
MLS data for the alternative comparable
A concise explanation of why the alternative sale is more relevant
Identification of the potentially inferior comparable and its location difference

That request does not guarantee the value will increase.

However, it gives the lender and appraiser specific, verifiable information to evaluate.

Compare that with a request stating:

“The seller refuses to lower the price, and several people believe the home is worth $650,000.”

The second request offers no appraisal evidence.

Reconsideration of Value and Appraisal Bias

A borrower may request reconsideration when they believe an appraisal includes discriminatory language, prohibited considerations, or other unacceptable practices.

Concerns may involve:

References to protected characteristics
Unsupported neighborhood descriptions
Inconsistent treatment of similar properties
Language unrelated to legitimate market analysis
Other evidence suggesting prohibited discrimination

The federal interagency ROV guidance recognizes that deficient valuations may involve inaccuracies, omissions, or discrimination.

Borrowers should identify the exact language, analysis, or inconsistency causing concern.

The lender must evaluate the issue through applicable fair-lending, appraisal-review, and escalation procedures.

Material deficiencies or suspected discriminatory practices may require actions beyond a routine value reconsideration.

Conventional Reconsideration of Value

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac established borrower-initiated ROV requirements intended to provide greater consistency.

For Fannie Mae loans:

The lender must provide information explaining the ROV process.
The borrower may generally request one ROV per appraisal.
The lender must review the appraisal before initiating the ROV.
An underwriter or appraisal specialist reviews the request.
The lender validates the submission before sending it to the appraiser.
The appraiser responds through the revised report.
The lender retains the ROV documentation.

The lender remains responsible for the reliability of the final appraisal regardless of whether the value changes.

FHA Reconsideration of Value

FHA also provides a process for borrower-initiated reconsideration when the borrower believes the appraisal contains deficiencies or the value is unsupported.

The FHA lender reviews the request and determines whether it contains sufficient information before submitting it through the appropriate appraisal channel.

The request should identify specific issues and provide relevant support.

An FHA borrower should not assume that changing lenders will automatically produce a new appraisal. FHA appraisal assignment and transfer rules may affect how the existing report is handled.

VA Reconsideration of Value and Tidewater

VA transactions may involve two related but different processes:

Tidewater
Reconsideration of value

Tidewater generally occurs before the VA appraiser issues the final Notice of Value when the appraiser believes the value may fall below the pending sale price.

The designated party receives an opportunity to provide relevant market data within the applicable timeframe.

An ROV generally occurs after the Notice of Value has been issued and challenges the completed value conclusion.

Veterans should review What Is the VA Tidewater Process? and VA Reconsideration of Value Explained because the submission requirements and process differ.

Refinances and Reconsideration of Value

An ROV can also arise during a refinance.

A homeowner may believe the appraisal overlooked:

Recent renovations
Additional living area
Relevant comparable sales
Superior condition
Accessory improvements
Market appreciation

A lower-than-expected refinance appraisal can affect:

Maximum cash available
Mortgage insurance
Interest-rate pricing
Loan-to-value ratio
Eligibility for the requested program
Whether the refinance still makes financial sense

The ROV should use the same evidence-based approach as a purchase transaction.

The homeowner’s personal estimate or desired cash-out amount does not establish market value.

Common ROV Mistakes

Submitting Too Many Weak Comparables

A few highly relevant sales are more useful than a long list of properties selected only because they sold for more.

Focusing Only on the Value Difference

The contract price does not prove that the appraisal is deficient.

Identify the underlying problem in the analysis.

Using Active Listings as if They Were Closed Sales

Listings show asking prices, not completed market transactions.

Comparing Different Neighborhoods Without Explanation

A sale from a superior market may not reflect the subject property’s location.

Treating Improvement Cost as Value

Construction cost and market contribution are different.

Attacking the Appraiser

Personal criticism does not strengthen the evidence and may distract from valid concerns.

Waiting Until the Closing Date

An ROV requires review, submission, response, and lender approval. It should begin promptly.

Expecting a Guaranteed Increase

The appraiser may reasonably conclude that the original value remains supported.

Real Lender Perspective

The strongest reconsiderations are usually short, factual, and organized.

They do not argue that the property “must” be worth the contract price.

They show:

A material fact is wrong
A relevant sale was overlooked
A comparison is inconsistent
An adjustment needs explanation
A property feature was misunderstood
A prohibited consideration may have influenced the analysis

The weakest requests are emotional collections of unrelated higher-priced listings.

An experienced lender should help separate legitimate appraisal concerns from simple disappointment with the result.

Sometimes the appraisal should be challenged.

Sometimes the value is adequately supported, and the transaction needs to be renegotiated.

Recognizing the difference can save time and help the buyer make a clearer financial decision.

Who This Guide Is For

This guide may be especially helpful for:

Buyers who received a low appraisal
Homeowners refinancing
Real estate agents
Sellers evaluating a low valuation
First-time homebuyers
VA borrowers
FHA borrowers
Jumbo borrowers
Buyers of unique properties
Buyers of renovated homes
Borrowers concerned about appraisal errors or bias

Final Thoughts

A reconsideration of value gives borrowers a formal way to raise credible appraisal concerns.

A successful request begins with evidence.

That evidence may include:

Factual corrections
Relevant comparable sales
Reliable property documentation
Market-supported analysis
Identification of material deficiencies
Specific concerns about unacceptable or discriminatory practices

An ROV should never be treated as a demand for the value needed to close.

It is a request for the appraiser and lender to evaluate whether the original report remains accurate, credible, and adequately supported.

When the request is organized, factual, and submitted promptly, it gives the transaction the best opportunity for a fair review—even though a value increase can never be guaranteed.